Search Here

A considerable portion of individuals with traumatic brain injuries, whose families opted to withdraw life support, might have had the potential to survive and experience some level of recovery, according to a recent study.

Traumatic brain injuries, stemming from forceful impacts, head jolts, or foreign objects penetrating the brain, pose challenges in outcome prediction. While some patients regain partial independence over time, families often face the daunting decision of whether to continue life-sustaining treatments shortly after severe injury.

To delve into the potential outcomes of such scenarios, Yelena Bodien and colleagues from Massachusetts General Hospital gathered data on intensive care unit patients in the U.S. over a seven-and-a-half-year span.

Among these patients, 80 had life support withdrawn, and their outcomes were contrasted with those continuing treatment, some of whom showed signs of partial independence.

The study pinpointed factors influencing life support withdrawal, such as age and gender. Utilizing an algorithm, researchers estimated the likelihood of recovery had treatment persisted.

Results indicated that 42 percent of patients with life support withdrawn might have survived and achieved partial independence six to 12 months post-injury.

Bodien noted the uncertainty in traumatic brain injury prognosis saying, "Prognosis after TBI [traumatic brain injury] is highly uncertain, and expressing this uncertainty to families is very important."

"Our results suggest that a more cautious approach is warranted when establishing prognosis [and that] careful consideration is required when making such an irreversible decision as withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment."

Bodien pointed out a dearth of long-term traumatic brain injury outcome information, which complicates prognosis determination and may lead clinicians to presume a bleak prognosis, potentially influencing withdrawal recommendations.

Damian Cruse from the University of Birmingham urged caution in interpreting the results, emphasizing the multifaceted nature of withdrawal decisions and the importance of considering patient preferences regarding recovery levels.

"Decisions to withdraw are multifaceted and don't necessarily hinge on dichotomies of 'will they be in a vegetative state or not?', but are more about whether the level of recovery is something that the patient would have been happy with," Cruse explained, according to New Scientist.

"That said, it is clear from this and other data that we are not as accurate in our predictions of recovery from the early period after injury as we would like to be, especially as these predictions will feed into families' difficult choices."

The researchers plan to broaden their study to compare recovery rates across countries and explore statistical methods for imputing outcomes accurately, aiding future estimations in patients whose life support is withdrawn.